Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: double jeopardy for z

By: clo in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 19 Jul 13 4:22 AM | 30 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 14148 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 14147 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Cactus Flower,

I don't think Holder will move forward with this case.
His speech to the NAACP is part of my reasoning. He strongly stressed changing the laws that were enacted to make people safer, when the reality is they endanger us.
This is the way to go. A retrial under any label would make tensions worse, something he doesn't want.
I don't think the case would have a prayer.

Holder has withstood many political fires, he has Obama's support. That's the reason Janet Napolitano is leaving the government, she wanted that position but realized Holder isn't leaving soon.




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
double jeopardy for z
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Fri, 19 Jul 13 3:38 AM 		Msg. 14147 of 54959

exceptions for civil rights violations.

what the heck are civil rights violations. sounds like most anything might be a civil rights violation if you want it to be.

so double jeopardy when the politics demands it.

personally, i'd fire the ag. it's becoming orwellian in too many directions. treatment of the press. nsa program advice. whistleblowers. now double jeopardy.

too much politics in holder's law.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next