Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The Pillsbury Dough Man Vs the Young Black Buck 

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 11 Jul 13 1:44 AM | 36 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 13984 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13983 by clo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"Are we to believe Z couldn't throw a punch in order to 'save his life?'" Yes. Clearly he was no good at fighting. Some people aren't.

It's all about the head injuries that you ignore.

Obvious case of self-defence.

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The Pillsbury Dough Man Vs the Young Black Buck
By: clo in ALEA
Thu, 11 Jul 13 1:00 AM 		Msg. 13983 of 54959

The Pillsbury Dough Man Vs the Young Black Buck

Listening to the testimony today & by the trainer, does the defense actually expect the jurors to think a man training 2 hours 3x a week for nearly a year in MMA was a wuss...

Or that the light weight teenager was armed better than the man with a loaded gun...

Are we to believe Z couldn't throw a punch in order to 'save his life?'

That he couldn't wiggle free, since he was trained in this method?

Since his gun was holstered, at his waist toward his back, under his shirt & jacket & T supposedly had Z pinned under his arms, how could T see the gun?

Instructions by the judge will be paramount.
The jury has a lot to mull over.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next