« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Evidence: right handed Trayvon has NO marks.

By: clo in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 09 Jul 13 12:10 AM | 22 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13960 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13959 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Cactus Flower,

That was a repost, my reason primarily was to agree with Dig in this regard.

Involuntary manslaughter would be a better fit.




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Evidence: right handed Trayvon has NO marks.
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Tue, 09 Jul 13 12:08 AM
Msg. 13959 of 54959

Hi clo,

You're going in circles.

CA was found not guilty because the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

Z is also protected by the burden of proof.

You find it hard to believe he talked after being shot but the PROSECUTION's expert witness said he would not have died for at least a minute.

Eyewitness testimony confirms M was on top beating the crap out of Z. The state of his head confirms it. Broken nose. Welts etc.

I get the program. Ignore the inconvenient truths. Repeat the prosecution theories. Make up stuff. Put some guy in prison for defending himself. Who cares. It ain't you serving time for nothing.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next