here are the claims of 8009636
and ALJ said:
3. Respondents' accused products do not mfringe asserted claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of
U.S. Patent No. 7,706,830; asserted claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,009,636;
again... unless NOK didn't transmit the short code...
CLAIMS
1. A wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) subscriber unit comprising:
a transmitter configured such that, when the subscriber unit is first accessing a CDMA network, the transmitter successively sends transmissions wherein each of the transmissions are derived from a first length of a plurality of chips until the subscriber unit receives from a base station associated with the network an indication that at least one of the transmissions has been detected by the base station; and
the transmitter further configured such that, subsequent to the subscriber unit receiving the indication, the transmitter sends a subsequent transmission derived from a second length of the plurality of chips, wherein the first length is less than the second length.
2. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein at least two of the successively sent transmissions are different.
3. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein the plurality of chips are chips of a pseudo noise sequence.
4. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein the plurality of chips are chips that are not used for spreading.
5. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein the plurality of chips are chips of a spreading sequence.
6. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein the successive transmissions facilitate power control when the subscriber unit is first accessing the network.
7. The subscriber unit of claim 6 wherein the power control of the successive transmissions is not closed loop power control.
8. The subscriber unit of claim 1 wherein the subsequent transmission is not closed loop power controlled.
| 