« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Nuclear Waste Non-Disposal

By: weco in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 30 Jun 13 4:24 AM | 15 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 53604 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 53603 by killthecat)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

And, all the old timers that had all the skills fro the handling, moving are slipping away.. Hanford is still a leaker,NV is divided, AZ/NM have slat deposits but may be limiting their use... We toured a storage facility in the SW, they had limits as it was only commercial waste, not nuke plants.. Major headache, too many NIMBYs,...


- 86 47 -


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Nuclear Waste Non-Disposal
By: killthecat
in FFFT
Sun, 30 Jun 13 3:05 AM
Msg. 53603 of 65535

Let the next guy worry about it. We're busy.

WASHINGTON — As more nuclear reactors across the country are closed, the problem of what to do with their waste is becoming more urgent, government officials and private experts said at a conference here this week.

Nuclear waste is accumulating in steel and concrete storage casks at reactor sites around the country. But the casks — sealed boxes of many tons — cannot be sent to any repository because they are not compatible, said Jeff Williams, director of the Energy Department’s Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project.

In addition, a growing number of the sites no longer have an operating reactor or the associated fuel-handling equipment, so they have no way to move the highly radioactive fuel to another storage package.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/28/business/energy-environment/quarrels-continue-over-repository-for-nuclear-waste.html?hpw


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next