« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Interesting breakdown of 5-4 on Prop 8

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 26 Jun 13 8:07 PM | 21 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 53468 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 53465 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

This decision had less to do with liberal versus conservative as it did with the interpretation of purely technical aspects of who has standing when bringing an issue which ONLY effects the residents of a specific state to a federal court. This case was decided based on a battle between different legal philosophies, not moral ones. The DOMA ruling had more to say about equal justice and what's right versus what's wrong. The Prop 8 decision was purely a law school exercise.




Avatar

OCU




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Interesting breakdown of 5-4 on Prop 8
By: clo
in FFFT
Wed, 26 Jun 13 7:55 PM
Msg. 53465 of 65535

In a 5-4 decision that crossed ideological lines, the Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to rule on the merits of Proposition 8-California's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court's majority that that the private proponents of Prop. 8 did not have standing to defend the measure in federal courts. The decision vacates the appeals court ruling holding the measure unconstitutional, but appears to leave intact a district judge's ruling that also found the measure unconstitutional.

Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia joined with Roberts, as did liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan. Justice Anthony Kennedy dissented with conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, as well as liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor. 

The ruling is likely to result in same-sex marriages going forward in California, but additional litigation is expected about the scope and validity of the district court's ruling.

For more information... http://www.politico.com


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next