« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: that is very strong language

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 07 Jun 13 9:26 PM | 267 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 46730 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 46729 by bim24)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

btw,

i do think you are right with respect to Samsung... i was afraid they may try to pull the sam sheet, but that's tossed now. I believe this may be the more important aspect of the ruling b/c we will still have to re-add LG to the existing case.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: that is very strong language
By: bim24
in IDCC
Fri, 07 Jun 13 8:43 PM
Msg. 46729 of 48237

TC

i think it was pretty obvious that LG's lic had expired and that it was ridiculous to arbitrate it...

unfortunately, the appeal was only about jurisdiction and whether they can arb or not, vs LG being a dick and not paying.

punting it back to ITC pretty much gave LG a 2 year extension on being a dick.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next