« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: its fairly amazing to me 

By: magillagorilla in IDCC | Recommend this post (3)
Thu, 23 May 13 10:50 PM | 419 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 46708 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 46706 by teecee)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Possibly it would help if they re-read the Commission Investigative Staff’s response to motion by certain respondents to stay investigation, Mot. Docket No.868?
(ITC/337-TA-86Cool

http://essentialpatentblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/337-TA-868-OUII-Opp-to-Motion-to-Stay.pdf




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
its fairly amazing to me
By: teecee
in IDCC
Thu, 23 May 13 6:24 PM
Msg. 46706 of 48237

one down day....and all of a sudden idc's problems are front and center...people tossing stock and saying i told you so...i am tired of this stock....blah blah blah...all i can say is...FRAND DOESNT SCARE ME...and neither does it scare IDCC...why dont you asswipes look at both sides of the coin...its entirely possible that a judge could rule for a frand rate of 1 to 2%.....and QCOM'S royalty agrreements would be a great place to start when you are trying to determine idc's frand rate....just imagine what a real 1% rate would look like for idc... 4 to 5 dollars per phone....vs the "buck a phone" ive been praying for all these years


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next