« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 01 May 13 8:26 PM | 92 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13421 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13420 by AppalachianArchitect)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

AA, no doubt vested folks are going to exert to protect their interests as they see them. In this case, as normally is the case of liquidation of real property the order with which folks are made whole is:
1. tax man
2. first mortgage
3. everybody else (e.g. 2nd mortgage, HELOC, etc)
4. "owner"

as energy improvements are generally "home improvement" and home improvement normally gets financed as the level of #3 above, and by migrating that to #1 above, Fannie and Freddie felt leap-frogged.

The ultimate back-stop for Freddie and Fannie is the federal taxpayer, whereas the property tax (#1) is local.

Unfortunately, what is likely the case is that the homes and property that would take advantage of this opportunity are also the properties that would likely never be foreclosed ... so one would hope that Freddie and Fannie did actuarials or whatever they call it on risk associated with property undergoing energy efficiency upgrades versus property in general ... and chill out, indeed such improvements would likely make owners feel MORE vested.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint
By: AppalachianArchitect
in ALEA
Wed, 01 May 13 7:57 PM
Msg. 13420 of 54959

A few years ago (c. 2009), some folks in Berkley, CA developed a program to promote energy improvements on real property through a local government funded loan program that provides for repayment through an increase in property tax assessments over up to a 20 year period. The program is called PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy and several states have passed legislation to encourage implementation.

In 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "poo-pooed" the idea because potential default might place mortgage lenders further down the list for financial recovery in the event of default.

The idea still has traction. My thinking is that power brokers are very cool to such decentralization and that is exactly where our Federal Government and politicians become obstacles in the way of a potentially huge paradigm shift embracing conservation and efficiency.

Imagine how many small "Mom & Pop" smal contractors might be suddenly flush with new work if such a program could gain a significant foothold.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next