« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint

By: AppalachianArchitect in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 01 May 13 7:57 PM | 113 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13420 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13417 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

A few years ago (c. 2009), some folks in Berkley, CA developed a program to promote energy improvements on real property through a local government funded loan program that provides for repayment through an increase in property tax assessments over up to a 20 year period. The program is called PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy and several states have passed legislation to encourage implementation.

In 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "poo-pooed" the idea because potential default might place mortgage lenders further down the list for financial recovery in the event of default.

The idea still has traction. My thinking is that power brokers are very cool to such decentralization and that is exactly where our Federal Government and politicians become obstacles in the way of a potentially huge paradigm shift embracing conservation and efficiency.

Imagine how many small "Mom & Pop" smal contractors might be suddenly flush with new work if such a program could gain a significant foothold.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Wed, 01 May 13 2:51 AM
Msg. 13417 of 54959

aahhh yes, centralized energy systems versus distributed energy systems. there is no doubt the decentralized solutions see little if not no financial support. so we can drop a few billion on a nuke plant and lose most of that power in transmission. certainly if one lowers consumption including things you've mentioned, the tractability of distributed power generation increases. things are moving "downhill" everywhere, stepping in between to effectively harness some energy in as durable and distributed manner as possible will certainly go a long ways towards reducing gross energy generation/consumption. most municipalities do require power grids to buy back or run the mater backwards, a fact that at least allows for distributed production. I would imagine big energy would rather such requirements were not in place. more can happen in these matters.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next