« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 01 May 13 2:51 AM | 86 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13417 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13416 by AppalachianArchitect)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

aahhh yes, centralized energy systems versus distributed energy systems. there is no doubt the decentralized solutions see little if not no financial support. so we can drop a few billion on a nuke plant and lose most of that power in transmission. certainly if one lowers consumption including things you've mentioned, the tractability of distributed power generation increases. things are moving "downhill" everywhere, stepping in between to effectively harness some energy in as durable and distributed manner as possible will certainly go a long ways towards reducing gross energy generation/consumption. most municipalities do require power grids to buy back or run the mater backwards, a fact that at least allows for distributed production. I would imagine big energy would rather such requirements were not in place. more can happen in these matters.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint
By: AppalachianArchitect
in ALEA
Wed, 01 May 13 2:16 AM
Msg. 13416 of 54959

Dig,
Indeed, I agree that government may be the appropriate place for debate on such issues, however, in a capitalist society we repeatedly see debate being swayed in favor of short term financial gain. The financial resources you correctly point out that are required by our "brightest and best" minds, certainly have the power to channel creative thinking toward the goals that may appear to reap the greatest immediate rewards.

I believe that our most daunting challenge is not how to provide enough new energy, but how to overcome the strangling power hold of vying for distribution of that energy.

It is interesting to me to consider how far along we have come with technological advances in IT actually using ever smaller volumes of energy by manipulating DC current instead of AC. And also, as with lighting technology: we are now developing LEDs which are far more efficient with less energy use and waste through heat generation. Site based electricity generation in our buildings promises far greater efficiency than distribution over our transmission and distribution grid. None of these developments, however, offer the benefits of scale to the power brokers.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next