« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint

By: AppalachianArchitect in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 01 May 13 2:16 AM | 74 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13416 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13413 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Dig,
Indeed, I agree that government may be the appropriate place for debate on such issues, however, in a capitalist society we repeatedly see debate being swayed in favor of short term financial gain. The financial resources you correctly point out that are required by our "brightest and best" minds, certainly have the power to channel creative thinking toward the goals that may appear to reap the greatest immediate rewards.

I believe that our most daunting challenge is not how to provide enough new energy, but how to overcome the strangling power hold of vying for distribution of that energy.

It is interesting to me to consider how far along we have come with technological advances in IT actually using ever smaller volumes of energy by manipulating DC current instead of AC. And also, as with lighting technology: we are now developing LEDs which are far more efficient with less energy use and waste through heat generation. Site based electricity generation in our buildings promises far greater efficiency than distribution over our transmission and distribution grid. None of these developments, however, offer the benefits of scale to the power brokers.




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Tue, 30 Apr 13 7:40 PM
Msg. 13413 of 54959

your penchant for large ideas coupled with brevity leaves me scrambling in choosing which interpretation you intended.

on the matter of government forums as a place for debate, I'm with j-t on this. the brightest minds you refer to 99 times out of 100 require resources and 99 times out of 100 those resources come from government, and government basically cannot allocate resources without debate. so in order to accomplish your stated notion of brightest minds developing energy condensation and storage one needs to accept the other component that affords that ... government debate. the brightest minds are rather cable of packaging things in a manner to persuade government - see earlier content on ethanol, no bright mind saw ethanol as a meaningful solution to anything, but it did adequately persuade government into affording bright minds the opportunity to massively innovate (and of course accomplish stated ethanol goals).

The US is at peak ethanol (essentially all gas has 10% ethanol in it), it is the least valuable fermentation product known to man [in a crude sense the value of a fermentation product can be measured in the number of carbons it has, ethanol is C2 ... the bottom, that it is an alcohol only compounds the matter - as opposed to methane, which of course is not a portable liquid fuel at STP]. Ehthanol has, however, displaced a staggering amount of fossil fuels over the course of its development, and has had considerable crossover technology that will bear fruits in the coming years.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next