« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

aa Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 30 Apr 13 7:40 PM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13413 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13404 by AppalachianArchitect)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

your penchant for large ideas coupled with brevity leaves me scrambling in choosing which interpretation you intended.

on the matter of government forums as a place for debate, I'm with j-t on this. the brightest minds you refer to 99 times out of 100 require resources and 99 times out of 100 those resources come from government, and government basically cannot allocate resources without debate. so in order to accomplish your stated notion of brightest minds developing energy condensation and storage one needs to accept the other component that affords that ... government debate. the brightest minds are rather cable of packaging things in a manner to persuade government - see earlier content on ethanol, no bright mind saw ethanol as a meaningful solution to anything, but it did adequately persuade government into affording bright minds the opportunity to massively innovate (and of course accomplish stated ethanol goals).

The US is at peak ethanol (essentially all gas has 10% ethanol in it), it is the least valuable fermentation product known to man [in a crude sense the value of a fermentation product can be measured in the number of carbons it has, ethanol is C2 ... the bottom, that it is an alcohol only compounds the matter - as opposed to methane, which of course is not a portable liquid fuel at STP]. Ehthanol has, however, displaced a staggering amount of fossil fuels over the course of its development, and has had considerable crossover technology that will bear fruits in the coming years.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Heat efflux and global warming +counterpoint
By: AppalachianArchitect
in ALEA
Tue, 30 Apr 13 1:55 AM
Msg. 13404 of 54959

Dig and CF,
Once again you've caught my attention with your interest in the "threat" of "global warming" and mankind's role in either "creating it" or "moderating it."

As a professional engaged in "energy efficiency," i.e., energy conservation in buidings for over forty years, and as a NIMBY living as a "near hermit" on a 40 acre tract of land high in the Appalachian Mountains for over 40 years, I have become appalled at the preponderance of greed and associated politicization of the debate over "global warming."

To begin with, government forums are not the appropriate arena to engage in such debates. In fact, the only reason for public debate over such issues can only be atributed to personal gain and should not be assumed as for the benefit of mankind.

Considering the geometric progression of our energy consumption over the past several decades, energy condensation and storage should be the quest of our brightest scientific minds while the general population focuses upon conservation.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next