« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: dang

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 24 Apr 13 9:50 PM | 89 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13386 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13385 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

well I certainly haven't heard of the notion. Given the salintiy of the ocean and the immediate environs, and even while recognizing that rainfall is of course fresh water, it seems there would be massive technical hurdles in getting anything resembling a carbon sink out of the deal.

Planting things, trees, is certainly a carbon sink. Mostly this is a matter of how we choose to use arable land. It is in some ways an argument FOR GMOs etc, if we can squeeze more AG production out of less area there is more area for big forest carbon sinks. It is an area where environmentalism and anti-GMO etc have their wires crossed. If we want to save the rain forest and plant trees everywhere and so on, we need the remaining land to be remarkably damn productive (even if it has some spooky GMO downside!!).

My own invention is simply this: grow stuff, feed that stuff to things that turn it into durable carbon stores, put the carbon on a shelf.

Make this (just one example):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polylactic_acid

and just pile it up somewhere, that is a carbon sink.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: dang
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Wed, 24 Apr 13 9:36 PM
Msg. 13385 of 54959

hi dig,

in your experience,has anyone suggested floating giant forest covered rafts onto the ocean. it kinda seems the space over the ocean surface would be a useful place to deposit carbon-munching life forms. when they sink to the ocean floor, they will get absorbed in a useful spot.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next