[i]First of all, are they kidding? At that age, girls are distracting to boys (just as boys are distracting to girls) no matter what they're wearing.
Secondly, making this an issue of constitutional protection (or lack thereof) isn't right. It's just a stupid justifaction for a rule.
--------------------------------------
(Reuters) - A New Jersey principal's ban on strapless dresses at a junior high school dance because they would be "distracting" to boys has enraged parents, who called on Tuesday for its reversal on the grounds it violates their daughters' constitutional rights.
The dress code shreds the 14th Amendment right to equal protection since girls for the past six years have been wearing sleeveless fashions to the dance at Readington Middle School in Readington Township, New Jersey, said parent Charlotte Nijenhuis.
http://news.yahoo.com/jersey-parents-demand-girls-bare-arm-strapless-dresses-022245280.html

What is the point of rules that are not enforced?