« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: dang

By: AppalachianArchitect in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 24 Apr 13 1:51 AM | 98 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13370 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13361 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Dig,
Understanding that we as humans are a part of an ecosystem and are not entities that exist outside of an ecosystem, my use of the word "complimentary" was misleading.
I meant imply what I presonally feel is a human obligation to seek balance (sustainability) within our ecosystem.

AA




Avatar


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: dang
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Tue, 23 Apr 13 1:10 AM
Msg. 13361 of 54959

im afraid I just dont understand the Q.

I'm not sure what consumption of complimentary ecosystems means, and I don't know what you mean by support our dominance.

Is the question: can we identify new ecosystems to consume in order to maintain our dominance? Or can we quantify our consumption of "complimentary" ecosystems to justify our dominance? The complimentary in "complimentary ecosystems" loses me.

"Support" as in validate, or justify, or to just maintain or enable in a structural energetic sense ... and so on.

So I ignored it as I don't actually understand the question.

"excess" suggests you are asking about support in a moral sense as excess is a value judgement as it pertains to human consumption (for the most part).

as we are somewhat ubiquitous, we are of all ecosystems at this point. so i can't figure what is complimentary. and so on.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next