Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: dang

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 23 Apr 13 1:10 AM | 76 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 13361 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13359 by AppalachianArchitect)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

im afraid I just dont understand the Q.

I'm not sure what consumption of complimentary ecosystems means, and I don't know what you mean by support our dominance.

Is the question: can we identify new ecosystems to consume in order to maintain our dominance? Or can we quantify our consumption of "complimentary" ecosystems to justify our dominance? The complimentary in "complimentary ecosystems" loses me.

"Support" as in validate, or justify, or to just maintain or enable in a structural energetic sense ... and so on.

So I ignored it as I don't actually understand the question.

"excess" suggests you are asking about support in a moral sense as excess is a value judgement as it pertains to human consumption (for the most part).

as we are somewhat ubiquitous, we are of all ecosystems at this point. so i can't figure what is complimentary. and so on.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: dang
By: AppalachianArchitect in ALEA
Tue, 23 Apr 13 12:37 AM 		Msg. 13359 of 54959

I'm delighted that you and Dig chose to engage the concept of evolution. My fundamental questions, however remain unanswered "or avoided."

In fact, are we capable of identifying our excess consumption of compilimentary ecosystems to support our dominance?

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next