« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: dang

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 22 Apr 13 11:17 PM | 88 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13354 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13353 by AppalachianArchitect)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

hi aa,

well, i don't really see evolution as a process designed to give free rein to human beings. if human beings inhabit or create an environment that suits other critters better (eg bacteria, rats or cockroaches), then evolution will tend to support the expansion of critterdom and the shrinkage of humanity.

the way i see evolution is a process that permits varying speeds of change but over time asserts a kind of gradual change average.

whereas paradigmatic change is rare and in my view mostly occurs in virgin territory. for existing environments, incumbents battle innovators. and the future usually develops out of the past along an inclined plane.

i've said the paradigmatic model was likely to be inefficient for years. it's nice to see wave adopting a one step at a time approach. by all accounts, simplification is working. megalomania has its drawbacks.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: dang
By: AppalachianArchitect
in ALEA
Mon, 22 Apr 13 11:03 PM
Msg. 13353 of 54959

Inevitably leads to "too dang many people."

"Intellectually speaking," as we endeavor to understand the negative aspects of human evolution, why are we inevitably guided to consider the premise posed above?

Is it possible or even likely that we might "flourish" with a yet unknown result of even greater population of human beings on the planet Earth?

Just askin'


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next