clo
“This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,”
...it appears that the 47 year old was trying to have "not sex" with a minor. Is the court going to get into the definition of "is"?

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!