« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: homosexual marriage

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 29 Mar 13 12:05 AM | 69 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 13074 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 13072 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

completely agreed.

while I currently enjoy many of those benefits, I also have lived were I do not.

and it is screwed up.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: homosexual marriage
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Thu, 28 Mar 13 11:58 PM
Msg. 13072 of 54959

hi dig,

http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/175/related/1/session/L2F2LzEvdGltZS8xMzY0NDk4NTIxL3NpZC9DN2pucGptbA%3D%3D

i think there's discrimination against the unmarried all over the entitlement system and throughout the tax code. starting with the marriage deduction. continuing until after the death of a spouse (inheritance tax breaks).

it's similar to the advantages of home ownership. if you can afford a home, you get tax breaks. which means if you cannot, you pay tax disproportionately. a neat regression in the tax code.

it's not that inequalities are always bad. i think they are fine in some instances. i'm all for advantages accruing to parents because i believe that to grow children requires parents to make sacrifices. since the state has an interest in the next generation, skewing things to encourage child rearing makes sense.

i am not so sure i universally agree that the state should offer privileges to a spouse eg one who has not been as financially successful. i am not sure why that is in the state's interest.

(i am using state to mean country rather than eg Arkansas)

but there may be a justification. eg let the elderly be.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next