« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told

By: ribit in FFFT | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 28 Mar 13 7:45 PM | 64 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 51167 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 51162 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo
...it doesn't matter whether it's ships or healthcare. If the gubmint does it, it gets expensive. There is really only one accurate way to predict the cost of any gubmint project. First ya take the estimated cost, double it and then increase it to the next increment. For example a gubmint project estimated to cost 10 million dollars will actually cost 20 billion. That's why the less gubmint does for us, the better off we are.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told
By: clo
in FFFT
Thu, 28 Mar 13 4:10 PM
Msg. 51162 of 65535

Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told
By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 12:00 AM ET

The U.S. Navy’s troubled Littoral Combat Ship, a vessel intended to be small and speedy for use in shallow waters close to shore, lacks the firepower it needs, a top U.S. navy commander said in a classified memo.

Vice Admiral Tom Copeman, the commander of naval surface forces, called on the Navy to consider a ship with more offensive capability after the first 24 vessels are built, according to a Navy official who asked not to be identified discussing the confidential document.

The Littoral Combat Ship -- derided by critics inside the Navy as the “Little Crappy Ship”-- has been beset by troubles since 2005 as the price doubled to $440 million per vessel. Source: Nicholas Kontodiakos/U.S.

Copeman’s memo, prepared late last year at the request of Admiral Jonathan Greenert, the chief of naval operations, indicates the Navy may be starting to re-examine the $37 billion program. A review could lead to an eventual redesign of the ship or the development of an entirely new vessel.

“He’s raising issues which no one with active-duty stars on their shoulders has said before,” said Norman Polmar, an independent naval analyst and author who’s spoken to Navy officials about Copeman’s memo. “He’s not playing the total party line. I think it will have an impact on people expressing their views.”

Producing a ship that can accommodate larger guns or Harpoon anti-ship missiles “would be a major redesign,” Polmar said in an interview. “It will be real work to put major weapons on the ship.”

The Littoral Combat Ship -- derided by critics inside the Navy as the “Little Crappy Ship”-- has been beset by troubles since 2005 as the price doubled to $440 million per vessel.

more@Bloomberg.com


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next