« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The two tier system of the Wave DD Board.*

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 27 Feb 13 4:20 AM | 139 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 12715 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 12713 by barge)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi barge,

Agreed. But I have been laughing about the crack pipe for years. Folks think they have some inside scoop, but rather than getting the scoop, they've been played for the dupe. (That's me being hip).

Wave hints this. Wave rules that out. Who cares.

I just ignore it all.

Wavoids are just ordinary folks trying to do their best with almost no information.

For my money, this is the same story as with SEDs and TPMs in the pc space. Software comes first.

Wave is potentially viable once there is a critical mass of mobile devices with secure hardware.

This is at least three years in the future. So I waste no time on it.

Will Wave tell us this? Of course not. They like people to be hopeful.

Gave up on prescience. The thing to look for is revenue growth.

Believe in your own intuition. It's that which serves you best.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
The two tier system of the Wave DD Board.
By: barge
in ALEA
Wed, 27 Feb 13 3:35 AM
Msg. 12713 of 54959

Hi Alea
Since this board is mostly about politics and social issues, this post IMO qualifies as relevant.

Here is what Waveduke posted earlier today regarding the Samsung Knox. His reply raised my blood pressure rather precipitously. I doubt anyone else reacted in similar fashion because the two tier system has been so endemic for so many years that no one notices anymore or cares. But I always notice and it always royalty pisses me off.

Waveduke starts out(see below post) with "From my understanding, you are going to have a long wait." My translation: Wave was contacted by a Wavoid regarding Samsung Knox who received a direct reply from Wave which stated that it was not involved.

The anger and frustration is the cryptic quality of the message. Who is the source of this "understanding"? The implication based on reading the Wavoid board for 15 years is that the source is Wave. Or was it? The only ones who would know are those in the for-your-eyes-only loop.

The Samsung Knox is an important issue, I sure would like to know what the heck Wave is saying!

The Wavoids in the for-your-eyes-only loop know what Wave is saying about Samsung Knox. On the other hand, the biggest weakness of this elite group is their ability to understand Wave communiques in their proper context. And the proper context is typically an amalgamation of maybe yes, maybe no, maybe probably, maybe inevitably, but definitely STAY-TUNED!

This is a topic that is never mentioned on the DD board for obvious reasons: It might royally piss off the majority of Wavoids who remain outside the loop. I belong to a 3rd class tier for insisting that the consumer side/Trusted Web Services will jump start the Trusted Computing Revolution. The two links below suggest that consumer lead, and enterprsie/DoD, will follow.

http://nstic.blogs.govdelivery.com/2013/02/26/beyond-user-names-and-passwords-meet-the-nstic-pilots-at-rsa/

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20121001006273/en/Ping-Identity-Teams-Criterion-Systems-NSTIC-Pilot

By: waveduke in WAVX DD | Recommend this post (1)
Tue, 26 Feb 13 4:00 PM | 191 view(s)
Boardmark this board | WAVX DD Longs Board Msg. 19794 of 19806

From my understanding, you are going to have a long wait. This is a separate offering and does not utilize a TPM. Again, from my understanding, Wave will have more near-term opportunities in the Windows 8 space, where a TPM is required.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next