« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: anyone notice*

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 11 Feb 13 8:28 PM | 100 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 12642 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 12632 by loosechange)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

hi lc,

i think the sensible presumption is wave cannot sell products at the rate it costs to build them in the first place. hence the mountainous deficit.

so if we can be bothered to see if something changes, we wait. but honestly, i no longer think the opportunity is worth the effort of research. far more sensible to let wave build its opportunity and report its progress than to seek to front run the income.

until the doughnut hole that followed the expansion, i always assumed wave was run by people who were pursuing a big idea as sensibly as they could - but the demand was elusive. since then, i am afraid i have lost confidence in their abilities.

there's always going to be another shiny thing. but in the end, free cash flow is the actual measure of a worthwhile enterprise. wave has to demonstrate it if it wishes to be taken seriously.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: anyone notice*
By: loosechange
in ALEA
Fri, 08 Feb 13 9:34 PM
Msg. 12632 of 54959

Further, NIST is shelling out more money for trusted ecosystem pilots. If Wave cannot produce business when someone else is willing to fund all if not part of it, then Wave is DOA. Is the last shiny thing - WEM -going to prove viable? Seems a little "poking" going on from the Synnex SKU list. Are these possibly some of the pilots? DLP (for some reason - not a o-to vendor)and ERAS (encryption mgmt) makes them a niche player and won't completely pay the bills. Thus far, I'm seeing Wave as a possible but very unlikely coat-tails "supports" player at best in the mobile sector.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next