« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

More constitutional problems

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 31 Jan 13 8:06 PM | 58 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 12580 of 54959
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Interim appointments versus senate obstruction.

Originalism even destroys Burkeian gradualism. Pernicious doctrine.

Excerpt

"This question will arise, in a different form, when the Supreme Court reviews a remarkable decision handed down last week by the DC Circuit.

The three-judge panel imposed new and severe limitations on the president's power to make interim appointments to the executive branch. Throughout the twentieth century, politically hostile Senates have repeatedly tried to undermine sitting presidents by refusing to confirm key nominations. Both parties have played this game, but the problem has gotten worse now that "silent filibusters," and similar devices, enable a small partisan minority to kill appointments. Without any weapons to combat this abuse, presidents can't fulfill their constitutional duty "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed."

In 1921, Attorney General Harry Daugherty responded to this emerging problem by interpreting the Constitution to allow the president to make interim appointments while the Senate goes on vacation. Over the next ninety years, this practice has evolved in complex ways. Presidents have learned interim appointments come at the price of alienating powerful Senators. But senators have learned that extreme partisanship will only provoke presidential assertions of their appointment power.

This evolving pattern of checks-and-balances raises important constitutional issues. But the Court of Appeals was not interested in resolving them. Instead, it repudiated the entire system for failing to conform to the original understanding of 1789. As a matter of history, this radical reinterpretation fails to do justice to the Madisonian principles inspiring the document as a whole. But once again, this is not my crucial point: If the Supreme Court allows this recent judgment to stand, it will be casting away the century-long effort by many thoughtful Senators and Presidents to make the Madisonian system work in a sensible fashion."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-ackerman/the-supreme-courts-war-on_b_2586512.html

So now we have a new problem following on from the abuse of the filibuster, the plutocratic electoral advantage and the gerrymandering of the House.




» You can also:
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next