Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Jimmy Carter!

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 28 Jan 13 11:13 AM | 66 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 12539 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 12530 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

It's not my theory that fits the facts around
the theory.....i don't have to make up dark
matter & dark energy to fit the math model because without them your model and math doesn't work.......

If that is not a clear case of fitting the facts
to support the model,i don't know what is!

That electrons,atoms,molecules are at their
fundamental root a probability distribution is
something i accept and work from that fact.
That people can cure themselves from taking
sugar pills is a fact my model easily explains...
It doesn't require spooky science as your
model does.

The Next Paradigm as all paradigm shifts never
comes from the center,it always comes from the
fringe and is normally a 180 degrees shift from
the present belief,paradigm.

The reason why atoms and molecules are fundamentally
probability distributions is because "matter" is
Virtual,a simulation....it's just computer code.
Because your computer Renders an image of a Mountain
in a virtual reality computing game doesn't mean
that mountain is real or made of matter,it means
it was a probablility distribution until the
computer Rendered it......that rendered mountain
is still fundamentally a probability distribution.


Anyways read this last night............

"Physicists working from a deterministic model
of reality have been tripping over this conceptual error ever since Isaac Newton uncovered
a few significant pieces of Physical Matter Reality's space-time rule-set. Their insistence that all
phenomena be forced into a deterministic causal model has blinded them to the true
nature of the reality they are trying to understand.
Even statistics based quantum mechanics is coerced to exist within a deterministic
straight jacket; the statistical description at the root is seen as only a nebulous intermediate
step before the final states collapse to some measurable physical reality. The
joke is: The statistical description represents the actual reality while the resultant final
physical state represents only a virtual shadow of the more fundamental statistical reality.
Getting it wrong is normal enough, but believing it to be the exact opposite of how
it actually is adds a touch of humor to the sanctimonious recitation of scientific dogma
by the high priests of science. Belief traps and narrow paradigms don't make you stupid;
they simply limit your capacity and ability to understand." My Big Toe by Tom Campbell.....

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Jimmy Carter!
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Sun, 27 Jan 13 4:55 PM 		Msg. 12530 of 54959

Hi j-t,

Nice description.

Folks such as yourself cause no harm to others. And I see that your Bible gives you hope in a cold universe. Seems to me that is a good thing.

But the absolutists - or puritans as I describe them - are toxic. Especially when they try to push their dim philosophies on others. There's nothing worse than the one or two verse junkies who weave their own web of bigotry from a text that should be consumed whole.

Theologians likely have interesting things to say about the Bible. But the views of bigots and charlatans clothed in Biblical justifications must be opposed. Aggressively.

If they wish to assert their ideas of morality and social order in the public domain, then it is appropriate to oppose them in the same space. Such folks don't get to proclaim their prescriptions for society and then hide behind the mantle of religion and say, such things must not be discussed for fear of offending religious people.

For myself, I should rather spend my time learning about nature by reading Darwin and Feynman and suchlike. And I find a kind of morality without recourse to an aged book.

But for those who discover in those pages reasons for compassion, reasons to help the poor, reasons to forgive - these kinds of things - I say go at it.

I tend to enjoy other folks' ideas. So long as they are simply sharing them rather than seeking to impose them. Then we are talking politics and not religion as I understand it.

My argument is with certain kinds of people whom I find repugnant and not with religion, per se.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next