« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: i briefly reread the cafc appeals

By: zzfan in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 15 Jan 13 11:58 PM | 329 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 46413 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 46411 by bim24)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

It would seem that codes that are not transmitted serve no purpose. However, I had a hard time just lighting the Bunson burner in school so take my logic with a grain of salt.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: i briefly reread the cafc appeals
By: bim24
in IDCC
Tue, 15 Jan 13 10:26 PM
Msg. 46411 of 48237

expanding further,
the panel stated that there were two alternate avenues that nok wants to challange/confirm.

1) Nok devices don't infringe b/c the scrambling codes in nok system are not transmitted

2) idcc doesn't satisfy domestic industry.


#2 is shot now. It is clear what Nok will try to do next. I can't comment on if there devices trasmitted codes or not.



« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next