« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

re: 9-1 Decision -- Is that true? 

By: WJS-635 in IDCC | Recommend this post (3)
Sun, 13 Jan 13 6:47 PM | 392 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 46402 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 46401 by teecee)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Exerpts from the decision are below:

INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Appellants,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
AND
NOKIA INC. AND NOKIA CORPORATION,
Intervenors.
__________________________
2010-1093
__________________________
On appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-613.
__________________________
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE,
BRYSON, DYK, PROST, O'MALLEY, REYNA, and WALLACH,
Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM.

* Judge Bryson assumed senior status on January 7,
2013. Circuit Judge Moore did not participate in the vote.
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS v. ITC

O R D E R
A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing
en banc was filed by Intervenors, and responses
to the petition were invited by the court and filed by
Appellants and Appellee. By leave of court, a response to
the petition was filed by Hewlett-Packard Co., et al., as
amici curiae. The petition for rehearing and responses
were considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and
thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and responses
were referred to the circuit judges who are in
regular active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied, and a
panel opinion and dissent are attached herewith.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court shall issue on January
17, 2013.
FOR THE COURT
January 10, 2013
Date /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk[b]

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
__________________________
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS v. ITC

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON,* Circuit Judges.
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
mj
By: teecee
in IDCC
Sun, 13 Jan 13 5:43 PM
Msg. 46401 of 48237

didnt realize it was 9-1...is that true? Mr. Green Mr. Green Mr. Green Mr. Green


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next