" what principle of "nature" turns illusion
into reality,empty space into solidity...just
because they are opposite?"
i don't think the difference between a singular and dualistic nature explains these things. that is not the intention of either hypothesis.
my hypothesis is an observation of the fabric of reality. it is not intended to explain things that have a different substance. or to explain anything beyond the existence of the thing itself. i think the universe is an arrangement of opposing energies. matter itself is a form of energy.
energy exhibits different qualities, depending on its state and its history - much like water. explode it out of a big bang and it splits into new forms. throw it into a star and perhaps it forms an atom.
i don't think the basic energy types resolve into a single one. i think the fundamental underlying energies are two - in opposition. i say this because i think it is implicit in what we call the singularity at the beginning of things. to have been single implies a force that holds things together. to have exploded implies a force that impels them to explode.
two forces in opposition - even if the concept of reality in this original state is intrinsically inconceivable to a mind that inhabits our reality.
all the subsequent states of energy are manifestations of one or the other of these original forces.
no one understands quantum mechanics. least of all me. richard feynman, one of the field's most famous nobel luminaries on the subject, said that "if you think you understand quantum mechanics you do not understand quantum mechanics." so the population of understanders is likely around zero.
the empty spaces in atoms and molecules that exhibit themselves at tiny scales do not appear in the middle world we inhabit. this is something we all know. i would call it a quality of the force matrix. nothing more.
i must trademark force matrix!
i don't really understand how your theory explains things either. when you say love is the root of everything, i have no idea what you are saying. it doesn't unify things for me. or explain much of anything. i don't understand how a theory about slavery, astronaut gods, gold mining, love, electricity and holograms is not a hodge-podge. i know it makes sense to you. but i am still struggling with it, to be honest. maybe i need to go maher (like csl has gone galt): take some wonderful drug to free my mind and travel along your rainbow.
| 