Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: the eye

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 17 Nov 12 5:53 PM | 66 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 11818 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 11816 by faul)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

hi doma,

i do. i enjoy your posts and the fact you have your own theory and keep pursuing it.

as regards whatever in man's evolution, the drawback is not in our inability as a predator. it is in our excessive ability to kill whatever we please.

hurricane sandy expresses nature's regret at endowing her creation with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. at her own expense.

wtf, she says. wtf. why did i do that crass, wave level of forecasting thing?

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: the eye
By: faul in ALEA
Sat, 17 Nov 12 5:46 PM 		Msg. 11816 of 54959

Hi Alea....


If you look at both Homo Erectus and Neanderthal
man both have large eye sockets and therefore
larger eyes....often quoted as better for night
vision.There's one night monkey whose eyes
are almost bigger than it's skull....

I was just posing the question why would a hunter
have a better chance of survival if it evolved
with a much poorer night vision,and massively physcially weaker body?

I was just wondering if nature could show
other hunter species that had also evolved in
that way....no sources i'm afraid.....but you know anyways i believe in the intervention theory of man.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next