But you surely know the snackman crowd will only support one of their own, and one of their own is useless to anyone who gives a damn about integrity and the operation of the business - rather than the big vision thingie.
And therein lies the rub, tkc. The SnackCrowd seems to have enough shares and influence to "dictate" whether a shareholder initiated change is successful. And putting one of their own on there would be a complete exercise in futility. Install an apologist on the board? No thanks.
It all changed for me, even after previous years of disgust with SKS, when I realized that to own Wave, you had to tolerate a crowd of financial illiterates that together had far, far more power and influence than "you" do.
I just don't care any more. "It's over" already. I wish you best of luck, and if I happen to own any shares on the day you successfully get something to a vote, you definitely have my vote.
There really aren't words (that I know) to convey my disgust with how this has all played out in the 16.4 years that I've been watching. But it looks like it's going to be "interesting" right up to the bitter end.
Regards,
D&O
| 