« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: why repugs lost Rs shellshocked!

By: meme in ROUND | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 09 Nov 12 9:01 PM | 110 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board
Msg. 44887 of 45651
(This msg. is a reply to 44880 by meme)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

My opinion: lessions for repug morons (but theyer morons so they wont learn). don't ever back a flip flop hedge fund manager who made his money gutting businesses and exporting jobs to china; dont cheat, assault, infiltrate and insult your opponesnts grassroots supporters -- espectially when you dont have any worth speaking of -- and expect those passionate grass roots people to EVER forgive for you. The good news is ryan is now tainted meat in presidential terms. neocon fascist posing as libertarian! hah!


the article looks at it differently and misses the real lesson. but it is worth reading as it suppports my points: no enthusiasm no independents; ron paul had all these and more and few of these were going to forgive rmoney stupiditst political move in recent memeory

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57547239/adviser-romney-shellshocked-by-loss/

They made three key miscalculations, in part because this race bucked historical trends:

1. They misread turnout. They expected it to be between 2004 and 2008 levels, with a plus-2 or plus-3 Democratic electorate, instead of plus-7 as it was in 2008. Their assumptions were wrong on both sides: The president's base turned out and Romney's did not. More African-Americans voted in Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina and Florida than in 2008. And fewer Republicans did: Romney got just over 2 million fewer votes than John McCain.

2. Independents. State polls showed Romney winning big among independents. Historically, any candidate polling that well among independents wins. But as it turned out, many of those independents were former Republicans who now self-identify as independents. The state polls weren't oversampling Democrats and undersampling Republicans - there just weren't as many Republicans this time because they were calling themselves independents.

3. Undecided voters. The perception is they always break for the challenger, since people know the incumbent and would have decided already if they were backing him. Romney was counting on that trend to continue. Instead, exit polls show Mr. Obama won among people who made up their minds on Election Day and in the few days before the election. So maybe Romney, after running for six years, was in the same position as the incumbent.


"Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil" -Ephesians (Paul)




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
why repugs lost
By: meme
in ROUND
Thu, 08 Nov 12 4:24 AM
Msg. 44880 of 45651

http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/11/divided-gop-resulted-in-obama-victory/#ixzz2BMXDk0bS

most of my ows friends and i woudl have supported ron paul, too!

now read this, if you want to see the future

http://dougwead.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/rand-paul-for-president-2016/

there is no future for the repugs; the demogrpahsics winds against them

but the republican party could have a future indeed if it will repent


« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next