« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: I agree with Gov Romney

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 30 Oct 12 3:49 AM | 82 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 11143 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 11142 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

hi dig,

funny thing is, devolution of powers to the states is not a silly idea where it makes sense.

but the caveat is important.

there are things that make more sense at a federal level and other things that make more sense at a state level. having a road on one side of a state line consistent with one on the other side seems like one of these things.

the problem comes when folks think the one is somehow infinitely desirable at the expense of the other. and they try to make the world conform to their principle. voici mitt and his idea about fema. it must be a bad idea to have fema be federal. the principle of states rights say so!

see the same thing with property rights. yes, we all want them. but there are also useful things called public goods and harmful things called negative externalities which don't fit the dogma. if you own the river upstream of me and pour the poison from your factory into it, my trout farm is going to get harmed. if i want to run a straight road from one city to another and your farm is in the middle and in the way, mayhap the common good is more important than the integrity of your fences.

some folks want their principles to be whole and inviolable. but virtue seems to prefer her principles diced.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
I agree with Gov Romney
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Tue, 30 Oct 12 1:52 AM
Msg. 11142 of 54959

Generally, as Gov Romney implies, God observes state boundaries. God does not do silly things like unleash hurricanes that ignore boundaries. Hence, I, IN agreement with Gov Romney, think that FEMA should be dismantled and the whole notion past to the level of state jurisdiction. Clearly these things always are very observant of state boundaries, I see no reason for Federal level consideration. Kinda like pretty much everything else. Highways, healthcare, national defense, homeless, immigration, voting rights, slavery, ... these are State's issues. They stop at the state line. Surely the liberals cannot ignore this truth?


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next