|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The above list shows replies to the following message: |
|
Msg. 11037 of 54959 |
|
can anyone explain the money-making model for any of wave's tangential businesses? esign apparently achieves us market dominance, yet appears to make no money. wxp failed on the basis of having no business model after spending $50m+. scrambls appears to offer a free service to consumers and the claims of upcoming commercial orders have gone the way of previous claims that esign was on the verge of doing business. is it really the case that wave is a charity? or does wave bear the costs and someone else receives the income? were they created to deliver revenue only once they are switched on within a trusted environment? or is there some cunning plan, baldrick, which is invisible to me? why is wave run as if income is an afterthought? perhaps wave is just ridiculous, after all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Webpage Design Copyright 2003-2011 http://www.atomicbobs.com/
|