While I have spoken with considerable admiration to what I consider to be one of the remarkable political humans of the late 20th and early 21st century .... I am not sure I want her as President ... but for the same reasons I'm uncertain about Obama.
On matter of the federalism, I am fine with them, both of them, and see little real difference (nor would I see such a difference were it not that Romney has sworn to be a puppet of freakshow wackos from Georgia).
The both, Obama, Clinton, and the Clinton before, show a level of comfortableness with the deployment of robatic weapons that kills 1, 2, 12, 20 , or 200 without regard to verification or what I consider due process in a a manner that I am not comfortable with.
I prefer restraint. I know all of Obamas drones make a striking argument against the militant right (like no presidential, nor all presidents ever, combined any fashion by any metric, has ever killed as many in such a manner).
Personally I seek a leader to sensibly walk away from the missile at will doctrine.
America cannot continue to be a missile at will country.
I just don't think it is what america stands for.
I know, 911 , yada yada yada .... at some point, I belive America must return to rules, its own rules, and the rules others observe.
I question whether HRC is that conduit.
Its been fun, you know tis whole, fuck em 911 happened so I just shoot missiles where ever I feel like it ... but in the end this cannot be the behavior of an enduring respected superpower.
We must, at that level, stand down. I doubt HRC is that leader.
| 
