it was in the cross hairs in the previous debate, the appropriate time, the appropriate place, the place with that title on the venue header ... and now they will seek to back-fill and cover a failure of BO to state that which is.
To borrow (this is getting old)
"Stanley, see this? This is this. This ain't something else. This is this."
(and one might think I have fallen under a spell of 24601 whimsy ... but, perhaps no person being more certain of the unlikelihood of that may well be 24601 ... but I digress, and the chances of me falling under a 24601 spell fall somewhere between zero and zero)
To me, my guts, my beliefs, and my ethos now requires that I piss on everybody.
I must piss on the host, piss on those I quote (even if they are quoting others) piss on god ((s)he is everything, hence almost impossible to miss) and then piss on liberals, piss on conservatives, and then ... if anything is left ... piss on myself. I benefit from last in line status, I will likely not be pissed on, I will have likely run out of piss.
Piss on host: So, the game is to dispute content, the message, and not make the messenger the story ....
from the host we have this, a post that only redirects towards the messenger, the messengers content absent to me in the hosts content:
#msg-758300
and the fact is the post that caused the host to get personal was mostly, but not perfectly, a post about ideas:
#msg-758294
On pissing on these other things, the target is huge ...
Where is the liberal articulation for why it is good to foster the development of anti-american democracies? Fostering the development of Anti-American democracies is a simply, at this stage, a fact, .... that one may hope for mutual respect is all good and well, I hope too. Romney has stated he will run against this hope. What is the response?
I think, in the long game, it is a good plan...
But I see no such articulation, and certainly lacking a Bill Clinton Voice, doubt it could be done.
So, what we have is a fuzzy articulation, fuzzy = failure. there are patters here fuzzy is ok, there are matters where articulation is required. The left says hope, the right says nothing ... well except the notion of some sort of bombing threatening mentality will somehow make extremists become centrists.
What drugs are the right taking that leads towards the notion that through demonstrative confrontation that suicidal extremist threats will suddenly go for the peace pipe?
Seriously, Romney's plans is that if we confront suicidal extremist wackos with all sort of bold and insulting language, they will bow.
That is a poor fucking excuse for anything resembling thought.
I said I would piss on me too. Outa piss. Except, perhaps, I am wrongly susceptible to the spin of the spin folk.
| 