« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: *Re: undoing the new deal and subsequent protections

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 28 Sep 12 6:18 PM | 49 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 10409 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 10403 by joe-taylor)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Ha ha.

Actually, Joe, I think he was just trying to be smart. Legally, a corporation is a sort of person. But it's a silly thing to promote on the stump.

The idea of not taxing corporations is that the surplus profit this would create may then be distributed to actual tax paying humanoids. So the monies would move from the Cayman Islands into folks' pockets.

Along the way, that money would be taxed at a person's marginal rate.

dig argues corporations may not distribute the money. That is also true now. But at some point, investors tend to want their money back. So I think there would be pressure to pay the dividends.

Perhaps one also needs special rules for closely held corporations.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: *Re: undoing the new deal and subsequent protections
By: joe-taylor
in ALEA
Fri, 28 Sep 12 5:53 PM
Msg. 10403 of 54959

How can we rationalize the statement made by itt Romney and others that "corporations are people too!" with this idea that they should not pay any corporate tax. Will we have the absurd situations that corporations could become part of the forty seven percent that Mitt Romney is so distainful of?


Regards,


Joe


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next