no question Nate puts it on robocalls and landlines, the right puts it on sample weighting. The two narratives both segregate the rolls similarly.
I just don't know if they actually do sample weighting, or if the relative weights are simply a consequence of the method (type of call/phone). Are the deliberately pre-determining the party mix they choose to use as a representation of what will happen? Or are they simply reporting the party mix that their polling discovers and that different methods discover different mixes?
Most of that data is buried at the premium subscription level it seems.
I still watch Ras pretty closely, Dems turn-out poorly and generally over-poll (at least over my lifetime) 2008 being the exception.