« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Why we do need more tax returns  

By: weco in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Sun, 23 Sep 12 12:10 PM | 93 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 46331 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 46330 by weco)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Flip thinks a VP candidate's taxes should be vetted for 10 years. Flip's father thought a Presidential candidate should be subject to the same examination, and most of us think Flip is not regally above it either. Also, some of us think we're entitled to proof that a President is not a felon. Others think that integrity doesn't matter at all but that school transcripts are essential. The latter people are too stupid to breathe.

When Switzerland opened its previously secret banking records to the IRS a lot of people were on the spot, as they'd been using Swiss secrecy provisions to illegally hide funds; the IRS bailed them out with a one-time amnesty if they'd pay in 2009 the taxes they'd feloniously evaded previously. We know that Flip had a Swiss account that he closed after the laws changed.

We know that he showed McCain 20 or so returns up to 2007, and McCain vouches for them , so there's no reason Flip would want to hide them now unless he wasn't paying. What no one is allowed to know if the content of the 2009 returns. Those would be the ones where some felons took amnesty and paid up.

This tax thing is hurting Flip politically, even with many Republican leaders and pundits. He's not accepting that damage because he wants political damage, he's accepting it because releasing the returns would kill him dead as a rock. Either he didn't pay prior to or including 2009, or he took amnesty from a tax felony. Our resident dummies may not think either of those is important, but clearly Flip does; it scares him. He's right for once.


- 86 47 -




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Why we do need more tax returns
By: weco
in FFFT
Sun, 23 Sep 12 12:08 PM
Msg. 46330 of 65535


In his 2010 return Mitt checked yes to having foreign accounts. However he has not revealed his FBAR which must be filed with his taxes detailing foreign accounts. In 2011, he checked "no" to having foreign accounts. Obviously something has changed. Without the complete 2010 forms, information on a 2008 carryover and the complete 1999 through 2010 original and ammended returns we will never know if they took Swiss amnesty.

It's all about integrity. Why should someone who has repeatedly lied to us not be vetted with the same thoroughness he required of his V.P. candidates?


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next