« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

The ALJ originally ruled against IDCC on Order 43, but he has 

By: my3sons87 in IDCC | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 20 Sep 12 12:48 AM | 343 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 46051 of 48237
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

now reversed and allowed the IDCC motion to compel witnesses for deposition.

491321
Quick-View

Details (1 File) Order 68 337-800 Violation Confidential 09/19/2012 03:11 PM David P. Shaw USITC Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc Title:Granting Reconsideration of Order No. 43
Not authorized to view.
491322
Quick-View

Details (1 File) Order 69 337-800 Violation Confidential 09/19/2012 03:11 PM David P. Shaw USITC Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc Title:Granting InterDigital's Motion to Compel Witnesses for Deposition




» You can also:
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next