« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Tense problems?

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 13 Sep 12 6:26 PM | 100 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 10006 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 10004 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

here's how it works.

gartner says bad things about wave: gartner provides paid for ratings that are bloody rubbish.

gartner says good things about wave: awesome organisation.

as you imply, one is better off reading those kinds of folks than the whole mound of steaming judgement about wave's products and prospects provided by optimistic investors.

at least someone in a position to judge has said something nice. sounds like the product suite is ready for prime time. at last.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Tense problems?
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Thu, 13 Sep 12 6:03 PM
Msg. 10004 of 54959

That said, the Gartner report was spot on last time. Wave was far from the visionary qudrant, lacking direct control of FIPS certification, hugely dependent on SEDs, and lacking DLP solutions beyond SEDs/bitlocker.

By acquiring SFND they brought FIPS certification in house, broadened their DLP suite considerably, and presumably cut their almost complete reliance on SEDs for revenue.

The SED reliance was later blamed (by Wave) for Q1 rev collapse (the flood thingy) although it is notable that those deals still haven't happened. t seems the Thai floods may have been a smoke screen, at least in part.

It was as if the previous Gartner report was telling Wave ... you need to acquire SFND with Wave's dependency on SFND specifically mentioned in the report.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next