So requiring ID to vote is bad, but requiring ID to select a Presidential nominee is OK? Where is the logic in this?
The voter ID debate has raged from sea to shining sea, casting the nation into the question of -should folks have to prove that they are who they say they are when they go to the booth? The democrat platform dictates that it’s none of the state’s business to confirm the identities of those who are engaged in state business. Why? Because that’s so racist …and poor folks won’t be able to vote. (Which is obviously the illogical fallacy of a false consequence.)
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/09/14709-dnc-to-require-id-in-order-to-attend-festivities/
What is the point of rules that are not enforced?
| 
