what'sup,
he said ... I have no idea, just banned you, I really really, have no idea.
Now as most know everything from banning to proxy votes comes entirely out of the "awk" central authentication proxy It is all good and well, but "awk", did you consider providing "Snackman" with some sort of uppers after subordinating him to your will with whatever else you knocked him about with?
In all my years I have never been party to a "Snackman" banning which came out as something like "I really have no idea, it was just after awk told me to vote for the board and it really all got very confusing .... zzzzzzz, oh, is that you Mac ... zzzz, oh its you awk ? zzzzz options for you, or who ... whatever .... awk, its you, right awk ... you are there right awk ,, the wrench is shiny ... right, we are safe .... right, I mean we have a shiny wrench, we don't need to think ... right awky? right? tell me it is so.... tell me I am safe awk, the thinking thing hurts"
And from that, I am banned. Seems pretty sensible. I can't imagine mixing with the wicked awk thingy and his doped up fool (or vice versa I really can't place master and dupe in this relationship, both impressing so well on the dupe side of things).
| 