Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Rape and mens rea

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 30 Aug 12 6:33 AM | 65 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 09686 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 09685 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

If a million people say think saying yes to having a cocktail is yyeeess, then much of the 98% I speak towards is the same post-contract circumstance you speak towards.

They are an identity set, depending on perspective.

Unfortunately, as a consequence of historical reality the error must, for a time, go the other way.

As per affirmative action.

As per any other remedial circumstance.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Rape and mens rea
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Thu, 30 Aug 12 4:46 AM 		Msg. 09685 of 54959

The thing I am discussing is post-consent sex and where the line is drawn between that and post-consent rape.

It isn't where no means no. It is where and when yes becomes no. I think that can be quite a hard question. I find myself a little perplexed by issues in this sphere. I don't think of the issue of "rape" in these circumstances as always having quite the same force. Potentially, I think there are fairly grey areas where the initial presumption may reasonably be "yes".

People climbing in windows is easy to figure.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next