You comments are sensible. You will forgive me if my knee jerk reaction is and likely always will be to disproportional protect the woman.
I think that no amount of this or that will change certain physical facts, and in the face of those facts we require bias ... significant judicial bias.
I believe significant judicial bias to be well considered.
I believe that in the face of broad real historical circumstances in the US, that certain quotas are required, some based on race.
In both of these I expect push-back. On both of these I may be wrong (either in desired effect or otherwise). In both I fully recognize that in some applications error will fall wrongfully on the innocent.
As a matter of government, the administration of large populations, on these few matters I am inclined to accept error. On other matters, I am inclined to allow the 10th to take over, this is my business, you go away.
| 