The goal for some time has been to defund government, later point to deficits, and then conclude it is broken and unaffordable.
Unrealized is a truth (never mind the decency thing), 1 thousand billionaires will never keep a trillion starving folk at bay.
The safety net serves the rich more than it does the poor.
Again, the safety net serves the rich more than it does the poor.
One more time, the safety net serves the rich more than it does the poor.
It is self-defeating dimness to ignore this truth.
I have been in bad places, the costs for my security massively eclipse the 5% extra in taxes I could pay to make it go away.
Seriously, 5% in taxes, or 50% of wealth to hire some sort of Blackhawk freeks.
What is that English blokes name, Branson? runs the Virgin thingy ... he'd be the first to tell you he is not so bright, prides himself in it, that a system let him make money.
Fair enough. Government protects that. Fund it.
A durable lack of chaos has let folks think they can take forever. There is no precedent for that (perpetual taking). They cannot. One redistributes as a matter of policy, OR IT SIMPLY HAPPENS TO THEM. The later is Bastille. Is that what Romney wants?
I believe I can kick his ass in a street fight. I know I can.
To protect his interest he shouldn't let it go there. Indeed, I would own him and a hundred of his hired in a street fight, and he thinks rules perpetuate indefinitely, they do not.
Save yourself Mr Romney. Build a safety net.
| 
