« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Incumbency issue

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 28 Aug 12 12:51 AM | 71 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 09631 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 09628 by Down And Out Man)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Exactly.

I'm not sure what else there is to discuss beyond sales at this point.

The magic bean believers in the mobile market haven't got me convinced, I'm afraid. I'm still thinking about PCs in a near term timescale. Same as Samsung, apparently.

There were feint hints of some SMA progress in the last quarter's results, but not remotely enough to get excited.

They need some sort of turbo-charged transaction to give them credibility, now that GM and BASF are fading into the sunset. But I have this horrible feeling that whenever such a deal is on the table, the man from Lee parachutes in and the next thing, folks run screaming.

Maybe the sense of entitlement - which keeps reappearing in folks' reactions to the presentations - makes folks unwilling to treat.

Otherwise, it's hard to explain the falling major deal rate. So far in 2012, there have been none. Golly.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Incumbency issue
By: Down And Out Man
in ALEA
Mon, 27 Aug 12 11:43 PM
Msg. 09628 of 54959

For an investor, "due diligence" would involve trying to discover whether this incumbency inertia can be overcome. As opposed to sussing out perceived possible dots out in the vapor mirage.

I want to read all I can about acceptance, or lack thereof, of Wave's products. Not so much some technical detail.

Maybe I don't know what DD means? Shocked

Dig, ROFLMAO. And, as Burt Reynolds said to Jackie Gleason in Smokey and the Bandit all those years ago: "Do the letters F.O. mean anything to you?" Wink


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next