« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Wavoid Quarterback? 

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 08 Aug 12 6:53 PM | 72 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 09209 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 09207 by loosechange)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Nah, snacks really is snacks IMO. A not so humble believer and follower of Wave and one who for whatever reason has sought over the years to maintain a internet presence for hopeful and optimistic thinking about Wave. The other guy is hard-wired indeed welded to the notion that a better wrench is a better wrench is a better wrench, that anybody who bothers with thinking about anything else doesn't get it, or is simply an emotional fool (who holds the wrench, how much does the wrench cost, who runs the plant that makes the wrench, who sells the wrench, whats the mortgage on the plant that build the wrench, how much are the wrench builders paid ... all of this, the stuff of don't-get-it emotional fools. It begins with a wrench, it ends with a wrench, the world is a wrench, wrench, wrench, wrench).

What I find fun is over the weeks the number of posts saying 'maybe the ATM was the only choice, Wave would have to show the PPers the douhghnut hole etc etc) and contrast that with current statements of "no winky winky" just a simple "do you want in?".

Basically, one pretty much says whatever works for the moment with no calling towards consistency (and hence credibility).

The fact is they should have done what I said they should have done when I said they should have done it. Instead, owing to their miserable aptitude in integrating EORR, they face-planted. Its not monday morning quarterbacking .... Its Game Planning!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Wavoid Quarterback?
By: loosechange
in ALEA
Wed, 08 Aug 12 6:39 PM
Msg. 09207 of 54959

Well we agree to disagree. I see him as very manipulative. Along with another resident "expert" over there who you say is in it only for the tech meanwhile quite eloquently gives his prediction of current SP on multiple occasions (see the post on THAT board and comments of shorting against the box, etc....) while also heralding a WAVX SP of $400 BEFORE the reverse split as I recall. Sorry that is not someone purely interested in the tech but someone equally interested in the price for a very particular reason.

Too bad Federer got routed Wink


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next