« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Your comment

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 13 Jul 12 12:04 PM | 81 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 08991 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 08989 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi Alea........

What is interesting is the holographic model also
explains all other known scientific phenomena such as....

Placebo effect,Multiple personality disorder,acupuncture,
miracles,psychokinesis,Human energy field(Aura),X-ray
vision,Ghosts,Precognition,Near death experience,dreams,
outside body experiences,paranormal,palmistry,psychic ability...

well the list goes on...........it is an all encompassing theory
that Unifies Everything...no other theory does that or even
attempts to explain it.

Take multiple personality disorder.........it is possible
for a piece of holographic film to contain a multitude
of different pictures by encoding each picture at a slightly
different angle of the laser.......by changing the angle of
the laser all the different pictures encoded can be retrieved.

As i have posted before your DNA acts as a laser reader/writer....
A person who has multiple personality disorder is merely
changing the DNA laser which reflects a different personality.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Your comment
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 13 Jul 12 3:00 AM
Msg. 08989 of 54959

Hi doma,

way i see it is that the particle-wave split is a manifestation of my opposing forces dualist reality at the most granular level.

but beyond that, i think my chance of understanding things is vanishingly small. even richard feynman apparently suggested that anyone who says they understand quantum mechanics does not understand quantum mechanics.

questions about god are of a different type. religion is a belief system based on things we do not know. science is a process based around the interpretation of things we do know. i don't know enough particle physics to say anything that isn't utterly derivative. if you want to read an interesting opinion, i am the wrong guy.

by the way, you may notice i am not disputing your theory. if it is plausible and fits the existing data, i am sure your hypothesis will be tested as far as folks are able. but bear in mind that the prevailing string theory of reality is something many believe in, and yet it is almost impossible to test. it is also simply a hypothesis. but my point is not that your science is necessarily incorrect. it is that your idea of what science is is not the same as mine. using my definition, which i believe is the one most folks use, your hypothesis is within the scope of what science may be - unless/until it is disproved. it may not be the prevailing orthodoxy. but the orthodoxy changes over time as different ideas survive and fail the tests scientists think up.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next