Hi doma,
way i see it is that the particle-wave split is a manifestation of my opposing forces dualist reality at the most granular level.
but beyond that, i think my chance of understanding things is vanishingly small. even richard feynman apparently suggested that anyone who says they understand quantum mechanics does not understand quantum mechanics.
questions about god are of a different type. religion is a belief system based on things we do not know. science is a process based around the interpretation of things we do know. i don't know enough particle physics to say anything that isn't utterly derivative. if you want to read an interesting opinion, i am the wrong guy.
by the way, you may notice i am not disputing your theory. if it is plausible and fits the existing data, i am sure your hypothesis will be tested as far as folks are able. but bear in mind that the prevailing string theory of reality is something many believe in, and yet it is almost impossible to test. it is also simply a hypothesis. but my point is not that your science is necessarily incorrect. it is that your idea of what science is is not the same as mine. using my definition, which i believe is the one most folks use, your hypothesis is within the scope of what science may be - unless/until it is disproved. it may not be the prevailing orthodoxy. but the orthodoxy changes over time as different ideas survive and fail the tests scientists think up.
| 
