« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Oops ....DigSpace, CF 

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 05 Jul 12 9:53 PM | 120 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 08858 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 08849 by Down And Out Man)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

briefly,

That tour and jose may or may not be different people or fourteen people is immaterial to me. I call it tour's board. I'm good with calling it that. I think that speak towards what is.

On exit points, my very weak confidence in anything resembling Wave management has completely eroded. Q1 numbers were a "reduce exposure" signal to me, one I of course acted on.

I plan to exit, on a lot basis, in accordance with best policy for taxes and so on.

WAVX is a trading equity for me going forward. It is not and will not be a buy and hold equity for me. The dudes in Lee have made Doonesbury look like a sober documentary. I have meters, just like peter, and when the needle breaks off all of mine, lee cannot be part of mine.

I have shares above and below water, and with all the wash sale stuff and so on, I am simply looking for exit points.

I will likely trade Wave for some time, but as far as long investing ... I'm thinkin I am going to join the methods of Sprague, Feeney, Bushnell, etc.

They seem to be dong well, the key is to not own, just be proximal.

I thank, in advance, the owners.

As part of planning an exit is trying to see if there is any reasonable near term bounce o something to flip some into .... but Lee speaks only of PP, not of NBD.

Its pretty simple, I voted my shares, I lost, its best I get out. However, I do expect WAVX to be a valuable trading vehicle, but I am going to go with the collective wisdom of the WAVX Board of Directors and Senior Management on whether it is a good long hold investment. Their position is that it is best not to hold WAVX but to be poised on the sidelines. Very well. Sidelines here I come.

They have been right (on the sidelines), and I have been wrong (invested) to the point where I am going to listen to them. They have the insider knowledge, they have the resources to act as appropriate, and the vote sidelines.


The fact that mgmnt did not sell into this spring as they always do reveals their need the cash for the wifey thing as a lie. They have the shares, they could sell them, they are in the money. The don't.

They value WAVX at something over 70 cents a share and something comfortably under 3.20 a share. They don't think it is worth more or less than these levels, these are the levels they demonstrate their appraisal thru action, the sell above 3, the hold below 1. They issue an ATM authority at 2.5.

The companies management believes WAVX is worth about 2.5 a share.

Its really pretty simple.



- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Oops ....DigSpace, CF
By: Down And Out Man
in ALEA
Thu, 05 Jul 12 6:01 PM
Msg. 08849 of 54959

Sorry to perpetuate this, but been offline and didn't see the responses until this morning. And I need to make a comment or two to clarify.

Dig, re: "I did at some point indicate to you that that board is no place to communicate to me on"

I did it there instead of here for only one reason. I was making a lighthearted joke in response to your comment here about betting on the community organizer. My response involved referencing a particular individual, therefore I was concerned it was against CF's board rules. So I addressed you elsewhere. That's the one and only reason I didn't do it here.

Dig, re: "that I was keen for exit points".

I wish I had seen this, would love to have a discussion with you about that. I need an exit point for my remaining shares now that I am convinced the chances for ultimate success (of wavx shareholders) are about two orders of magnitude less than the miniscule amount I believed just a couple of years ago.

Dig, re: "I thought tour would be flattered. Guess not."

TOUR? What does he have to do with it? Are you suggesting that Jose is Tour? I am not aware of that being a fact. Can you elaborate?

CF,re: "the AB WAVX board is a ban fest."

Again, in my ignorance I was not aware it was a banfest, which to me implies many, many bans, such as is the case with the dd board. I was aware of only a very few. Did not know it was a fest.

CF, re: "He is an obvious partisan for cynicism about WAVX." Yep, a partisan, but willing to allow plentiful discussion from both sides....but the "other" side rarely engages. They have no use for the place. But they are allowed, at least in my observations.

CF, re: "And the other half of the board's content is fat jokes...."

I am not a fan of that, and do not participate in ridiculing his physical appearance. I am more than willing to participate in ridiculing his poor management and governance. It enrages me that my "fellow shareholders" enable it. But I certainly don't go for the donut jokes. But it's their right to go there if they feel the need.

Bottom line, as usual for me with removed posts, I feel a loss for not having gotten to see and participate in Dig's commentary. I'd like to have that conversation about exit points.

D&O


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next